WorldNetDaily.com recently did an exposé 
on nudity and sex in Wikipedia being easily accessible to children. As a result of this news coverage, the FBI is now reviewing a Wikipedia nude photo of a 10 year old girl; as a possible violation of Federal child-pornography laws.
Wikipedia has once again made the tabloid news headlines. Not once, but twice. Wikipedia is sheepishly begging the court to drop a Defamation Lawsuit filed against it because they are not responsible for its reason for being, reports John H. Gohde.
John H. Gohde saved the day when he expertly rescued The Trolls of Wikipedia blog from a fate worst than death. It was a close call, but John knew exactly how to retrieve its home page from the throws of certain doom much to the chagrin of JLH.
John H Gohde is only one of thousands and thousands of people who have come to the exact same conclusions about Wikipedia. There is a new interesting blog post on the trials and tribulations of trying to edit articles on Wikipedia.
In recent weeks, news stories have reported on how the Trolls have been gaming Wikipedia. While the Trolls of Wikipedia ban honest editors for gaming the system, they themselves have brought the art of gaming to a new level of depravity. Sex and money scandals are only the tip of the iceberg, reports John H. Gohde.
The Truth About Wikipedia sounded like an interesting video that was posted recently to YouTube. But at 43 minutes, I soon gave up trying to play it on dial-up. Why Google and YouTube seem not to comprehend the fact that many people are not connecting to the Web with monstrously big, expensive and powerful computers with lightspeed connections using the latest technology; is totally beyond John H. Gohde.
John H. Gohde discovered where the Trolls of Wikipedia like to hang out. John says if you don’t think that these Trolls exist to dump on other people, then think again! Trolls live to dump on Wikipedians that they consider beneath them, reports John H. Gohde.
John H. Gohde asks: Are Wikipedians on Crack?
Mr. Gohde would like to know what is the big deal? John H. Gohde could set up a free blog that anyone can edit overnight. Heck, John could even call it a free encyclopedia. 
(more…)
John H. Gohde reports that one fool recently commented that he had gone too far dumping on some of the specific trolls at Wikipedia. John’s position is that on the contrary, John H. Gohde has not gone nearly far enough to ridicule these sorry excuses for human beings at Wikipedia.
John H. Gohde is not doing anything that the Trolls of Wikipedia did not first do to him. What the trolls did to him, John is all too glad to do back to them.
John Gohde was viciously attacked by the Trolls of Wikipedia when he first started placing his infamous infoboxes in the various articles and talk pages on Wikipedia. John wasn’t doing anything that the other wikiprojects were not doing at the same time. Marking articles on Wikipedia that were related to your project was simply what project participants did, according to John Gohde.
The critics of John H. Gohde are legendary. Criticisms of John H. Gohde exist all over the place. The Trolls of Wikipedia have attacked John H. Gohde on numerous occasions. And, have banned him 4 times from Wikipdia. Yet, the accomplishments of John H. Gohde on Wikipedia speak for themselves.
The most obvious examples of success for John H. Gohde that the Trolls of Wikipedia prefer to ignore are the: (1) Wikiproject on Alternative Medicine and (2) CAM Portal.
John H. Gohde has a never ending need to post stuff about Wikipedia. John says an obvious topic would be trolls who have gotten in his face at Wikipedia. Mr. Gohde after reviewing his third arbitration case, says that Snowspinner the Troll, clearly stands out.
John H. Gohde was attacked recently for calling all admins mentally ill. (more…)
John H. Gohde asks: Why would anyone want to attend a Wikimania event? Will anything actually be accomplished in Wikimania 2008?
John H. Gohde says that Jimbo Wales is pushing to re-write history in his image. Mr. Gohde is no fool. Like all internationally held not-for-profit sponsored conferences Wikimania, according to John H. Gohde, is just anther excuse to travel at someone else’s expense. It is a time to party, for the Rich and Famous.
John H. Gohde says that the more he reads about Jimbo Wales in the tabloid press, the funnier it gets.
Danny Wool on his blog publicly accused Jimbo Wales of spending improprieties on Saturday, March 1, 2008. according to John H. Gohde
John H. Gohde asks who is Danny Wales? Danny, the former Grants Coordinator, is reported to have worked for the Wikimedia Foundation from October 2005 to March 2007 at a paid salary of $40,000 a year. John says Wool supposedly arranged Jimbo’s travel schedule and negotiated his speaking fees.
(more…)
John H. Gohde has an inquiring mind, and has definitely noticed how Wikipedia simply cannot stay out of the tabloid newspapers.
Apparently, Jimbo believes his own public image about being the dictator of Wikipedia. John H. Gohde says that clearly, Wales thinks nothing of using others around him as play things, only to be later discarded like trash at his own pleasure. Does classy Jimmy Wales know how to treat the (more…)
Any article on Wikipedia written on a fringe topic, or expresses a fringe point of view, is a target for the Trolls of Wikipedia. John H. Gohde knows all about how the Trolls just love to defecate on articles related to alternative medicine.
According to John H. Gohde a favorite tactic of the skeptics is to post Notice Banners on articles that appear directly below the title of the article. (more…)
John H. Gohde is utterly obsessed with content and could not give a darn about Wikipedia, Wikipedians, Wikipedia’s culture of wasting time, and their obsession with process.
Anybody can edit Wikipedia, says John H. Gohde, but only if they are intimately familiar with 100’s of process rules: (more…)
On the 2nd ban, the complaint was filed by David Gerard. It is as clear a case of railroading as you can get. It took place at the time of the creation of the Wikiproject on Alternative Medicine by John H. Gohde.
Who is the real David Gerard, asks John H. Gohde.
(more…)
The last arbitration case of John H. Gohde was different from all the rest. This time around, John had a Champion. A Champion is a person who fights for or defends any person or cause. That is right, another editor, recognized that Mr. Gohde was being violated by Wikipedia. And, stepped up to the plate to defend John H. Gohde by presenting evidence at obious risk to his status as an editor on Wikipedia.
Contrary to the tabloid journalism of the Hate Blogger, at least one other independent third party recognized precisely the farce being inflected upon John H. Gohde by Wikipedia. And, that person was User:Kendrick7. (more…)
John H. Gohde says that he has just now bothered to take a closer look at the specific Trolls that passed judgment upon him in his first ban. And, John has a picture of all those Trolls.
If John H. Gohde cannot go to the hate blogger, the Hate Blogger will be coming to him. And, so he has.
John H. Gohde officially announces the arrival of the Hate Blogger.
And, so has Wikipedia come to the new blog of John H. Gohde. For the Hate Blogger admits to being on Wikipedia. Since the Hate Blogger came to John H. Gohde, so has Wikipedia.
John H. Gohde reports that Wikipedia is now ignoring the wishes of more than 100,000 Muslims who have been complaining for quite a while about Wikipedia’s publication of their Prophet’s picture. Jay Walsh, a spokesman for the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco, has even suggested that many of the those thousands of emails recievied by Wikipedia are less than acceptable since they have received so many similar looking emails since mid January 2008 according to John H. Gohde. (more…)
Who is Igor the Troll, or Igor Berger, asks John H. Gohde?
John H. Gohde says that he does not know and doesn’t really care at all. As far as John is concerned, Igor is just another character that he had happened to have run into on his many journeys on the Internet. John views Igor as a very minor irritation in a Google group that Mr. Gohde was once on.
The last stay of John H. Gohde on Wikipedia was very successful. Editing on Wikipedia is largely a waste of time, for many different reasons. But his 4th stay on Wikipedia was more than twice as long in duration than any of John Gohde’s previous stays. Overall, John was very happy with what he was able to accomplish regarding the WikiProject on Alternative Medicine. (more…)
If John H. Gohde can not go to Wikipedia, Wikipedia will be coming to him!
Banned users may not contribute to any part of Wikipedia, including their user talk pages.
John H. Gohde was able to edit his talk page, during his last ban. He did it serveral times with absolutely no problems. So, this time around John H. Gohde attempted to add a little commentary to wrap things up up on his talk page. And, was blocked by one of the mentally ill admins who managed to get John H. Gohde banned yet again for merely exercising his Free Speech rights. (more…)
The hate blogger has recently reported on the current problems of John H. Gohde on Wikipedia. So, the fact that John was recently banned once again is no secret. On this post Mr. Gohde will comment briefly on the recent findings of fact by the Arbitration Committee at Wikipedia.
John H. Gohde (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) was previously sanctioned in three Arbitration cases (Theresa knott vs. Mr-Natural-Health, Mr-Natural-Health, and John Gohde) for inappropriate behavior.
Blocked: 48 hours per [2]. Edit warring and incivility at Complementary and alternative medicine. [3] [4] [5] Technically, the even if the one-year attack parole at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/John H. Gohde only took effect after the one year ban expired, the parole expired on 30 April 2007. And John only has one recent block. (more…)
In the case of John H. Gohde, John was banned yet again for promoting alternative medicine all too well on Wikipeidia.
John H. Gohde says notice how the deletion of a number of the project’s infoboxes were singled out by the Arbitration Committee. That was no accident, according to John.
While currently accepted in Wikipedia, the project’s placement of templates and infoboxes on the talk pages and articles by John H. Gohde was vehemently attacked back then. John H. Gohde and his project on alternative medicine tagged perhaps at best 250 talk pages of (more…)
In Mr-Natural-Health, Wikipedia’s Arbitration Committee totally failed to put any effort into their fact finding at all. In other words, John H. Gohde says that the Arbitration Committee just relied on the findings of their previous ban. That is hardly an indication of impartiality! And, it is why John considers the first two bans to be actually only one ban.
Of course, the second arbitration case involving John H. Gohde was entirely different from the first one. John’s activities were entirely different. The actual topic of the second case was John’s promotion of alternative medicine on Wikipedia, when John H. Gohde actually (more…)
Theresa knott vs. Mr-Natural-Health is where Wikipedia decided that John H. Gohde had “behaved inappropriately on a consistent and excessive basis.” Perhaps Mr. Gohde did at that time? But, Wikipedia most certainly did not conclude that on his current ban according to John. (more…)
Welcome to John H. Gohde on Wikipedia Trolls.
John will be writing on life as an editor on Wikipedia. Mr. Gohde will be functioning as:
In short, John H. Gohde will be trolling for the Trolls of Wikipedia.
All material on this blog is copyrighted unless otherwise indicated.
